Exam Center
Book a demo
Solutions

Universities & colleges

Semester exams that hold up to scrutiny — in the languages your students actually sit them in.

The typical flow for this segment, and what it provesThe typical path for this segment, left to right: Build the bank once, then Generate section papers from pools, then Publish and freeze, then Deliver with proctoring, then Review flagged sessions, then Publish results and outcome report. What it leaves behind afterwards: which paper — each candidate sat, byte for byte; what was decided — by whom, and why; outcome distribution — by Bloom level, section, cohort.THE TYPICAL PATH01Build the bankonce02Generate sectionpapers from pools03Publish andfreeze04Deliver withproctoring05Review flaggedsessions06Publish resultsand outcomereportWHAT IT LEAVES BEHINDwhich papereach candidate sat, byte for bytewhat was decidedby whom, and whyoutcome distributionby Bloom level, section, cohort
01

Your reality

Thousands of candidates across departments, results that must survive an appeal, accreditation files that need outcome data, and a student body that does not share one language.

The university realityThousands of candidates across departments, results that must survive an appeal, accreditation files that need outcome data, and no single shared language.What makes this hardScaleMANY DEPARTMENTSAppealsRESULTS MUST HOLD UPAccreditationOUTCOME DATA REQUIREDLanguagesNO SINGLE SHARED ONE
02

How it is handled

Publish-time immutability means the paper cannot drift. Bloom classification produces the outcome distribution accreditation asks for. Thirteen languages, tracked per section, with human approval before use. Departments run as separate tenants when they need to.

How it is handledPublish-time immutability, Bloom outcome data, thirteen languages with human approval, and departments as separate tenants.Exam CenterONE PLATFORMFrozen papersBloom outcome dataThirteen languagesDepartments as tenants
03

What you can prove afterwards

Which paper each candidate sat, byte for byte. What was detected, what a reviewer decided, and why. Outcome distribution by Bloom level, by section, by cohort.

What a university can proveThe exact paper each candidate sat, what was detected, what a reviewer decided, and outcome distribution by Bloom level.What you hold afterwardsThe exact paper satSNAPSHOTWhat was detectedWITH CONFIDENCEWhat was decidedWITH A REASONOutcomes by BloomBY SECTION, BY COHORTENOUGH TO ANSWER A CHALLENGE
01

Typical flow

Build the bank once → generate section papers from pools → publish and freeze → deliver with proctoring dialled to the exam → review flagged sessions → publish results → export the outcome report.

Typical flow

What running it actually looks like.

Six steps, in the order you would do them. Nothing here needs a services engagement.

The typical path through the platformBuild the bank once → Generate section papers from pools → Publish and freeze → Deliver with proctoring → Review flagged sessions → Publish results and outcome report01Build the bank once02Generate section papers from pools03Publish and freeze04Deliver with proctoring05Review flagged sessions06Publish results and outcome report

Bring one paper. We'll run it live.

Thirty minutes, your own exam, no slide deck.